Police Ethics and Corruption Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Police Ethics and Corruption - Research Paper Example Police misconduct and indiscipline are a common phenomenon in the daily living of the police. Police should apply the integrity, which implies that when right decisions are made, the values of the society should be taken into consideration. However, the paradox is that conflicts within the set standards can lead to the so-called noble cause corruption. The police culture Police culture refers to the way of living of the police, the tasks they do, the hard work, and their relationship with their fellow officers. The police have a culture that emphasizes acting, not introspection (Pollock, 2011). In the local or international police training, the police engage in heart-felt tasks that are at times tearful. The kind of training that the police undergo totally demeans their human dignity, especially if there is a concomitant willingness to acknowledge the struggle for treatment with respect. These trainings the police undergo instill ethical conduct of a real police to them. Among the po lice, ethical standards and respect for human rights shape with time and place (Pollock, 2011). The police have influence and constrains from the broader ethical standards and expectations of the society. Therefore, they must be realistic on the limits of a human dignity-centered approach. Other factors leading to devilment of attitudes, behaviors, and perceptions that relate to the police culture reinforces their interactions. The general view of the police culture is negative. The police believe in the blue wall of silence which makes them free of being accountable of any misconduct. The professional codes of behavior or the ethical codes of the police intend to elicit the set of desired attitudes and responses to the members of the police department. The actions undertaken by the police remind us the expectation from them, that is, to provide a common vocabulary of difficult cases (Jetmore, 2005). The police reinforce and share values and militate against the adverse aspects of t heir occupation and influence. The police culture has adopted the general conduct of law enforcement. Policing the community Community policing promotes the organizational strategies, which support systemic partnership and problem solving techniques that address the immediate conditions like public safety issues, crime, disorders, and the fear of crime in the communities. The policing within the community aims to support the delivery of community confidence through personal and protective policing. It provides a strategy for future protection opportunities that build the foundations of security. The community policing reflects a collaborative efforts between the police and the community. It is founded in a close mutual benefit of the police and the community members. Generally, the community policing revolves around three factors, which are partnership between the police and the community, problem-solving methods that identify and address the concern of the community, and, lastly, t he change in the management in the police organization to accommodate the increased community involvement (Pollock, 2011). The community policing originates from the time when the citizens of the United States were themselves the police. However, this has transformed, and the police have taken these security provision roles. Value-based decision-making and the ethics of noble cause Police are the basic units of

What was the short term significance of the successful testing of the Coursework

What was the short term significance of the successful testing of the atomic bomb - Coursework Example Ever since the World War I, the world had been on the brink of a similar conflict and these fears manifested themselves in the form of the second Great War. The United States were involved in both conflicts indirectly, but the Pearl Harbour incident instantly brought them to forefront of the war. OVERVIEW The successful testing of nuclear bomb in the desert of New Mexico later culminated with the US finally dropping the bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Before the bombing, Truman described his predicament as he could not decide whether to ‘invade Japan proper or shall we Bomb and blockade’ (Truman, 1945). The stance on Japan had been very precarious from the start as they continued with their ruthless land grabbing behaviour; Truman was already in the process of considering all the options at hand to tackling with them. In his memoirs, Truman recalls that he had discussed the possibility of a full-scale invasion with his associates, but the United States wished to make a h eavy blow to Japanese, which would completely rule out the possibility of a fierce counterattack from them. Hence, it was decided that atomic bomb would be dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which were considered to be the main military equipment manufacturing centre for the Japanese forces. CONSEQUENCES The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki ‘incinerated’ nearly 20,000 Japanese people. The casualties largely consisted of unarmed civilians, but the bombing was more strategic because most the arms factories were located in this district. Within a couple of hours, the cities were turned into ‘smelting hot furnace’ as described by a survivor of the atomic bomb, Hiroshi Morishita; a high school student at the time the bomb was dropped. The repercussions of the bomb were unspeakable as the people walked with their skin hanging and burnt; people died after vomiting blood or a black foam (Morishita, 2006). Therefore, the United States had achieved its goal of makin g a heavy blow on the Japanese as both cities were literally razed to the ground. The scale of disaster inflicted upon by the atomic was truly unprecedented that left thousands dead and millions injured. Survivors and Red Cross officials saw the break out of an epidemic as a result of the radiation; many of the illnesses and symptoms exhibited by the people seemed like the effects of X-ray overdose. The repercussions affected the following generations along with the reproductive cycle as men suffered from impotency and women began to have miscarriages (Hersey, 1994). However, on the United States’ part it was just a blatant ‘display of power’. Sherwin (1973) believed that the United States simply wanted to have a more intimidating facade on an international level and the destruction caused by the nuclear weapon was sufficient to underscore their point. The general masses feared the use of such weapons on a larger scale and other countries began a fierce nuclear a rms race in order to match up to the United States. It was the biggest gamble taken by the United States, for the experiment posed a major threat to the lives of the scientists. The country had invested nearly $2 Billion on this project and required manpower of 130,000 people; the success in the project Manhattan proved to be a milestone for the country (CBTO, 2010). The bombings marked the first time in history that a weapon of mass destruction was used that shook everyone and caused them to fear future conflicts that would involve the use of such weapons. It made everyone realize the need to regulate modern warfare; opening up new method of war that was not only restricted to the